Jump to content

markmonkey1

Members
  • Posts

    127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by markmonkey1

  1. I'm about to pull the trigger on an HDS5. It comes with the 83/200 xducer. But I'm reading the 50/200 may be better for deep water Lake Ontario salmon trolling (200-600 fow). What are you using?

    Oh, I'll be using it on the shallower Lake Erie for walleye too (<100 fow).

  2. I have read the 50 kHz is better than the 83 khz for picking up the thermocline. Anyone have experience in that regard?

    Seems that the HDS5 units with inland lake mapping (I.e. Lake Ontario) have the 83/200, while the units with the coastal waters maps (nautical) have the 50/200. So I guess most of you have the 83 transducer...which is fine for Lake O?

    FYI - Gen1 vs Gen2: Gen2 has 2x the memory and processor speed as G1. The G2 is wifi capable (with the added $200 wifi-1 module), this permits you to display the lowrance screen on your mobile device (smartphone or tablet).

    Sent from my iPad using Lake Ontario United

  3. Looking at GPS/sonar combo units and pretty much settled on an HDS5. The lake insight models come with 83/200khz transducer and the nautic models come with the 50/200 xducer. I'll be mainly trolling deep water in Lake Ontario. Think the 83/200 is sufficient?

    Also,are Lk Ontario contour maps on either of these?

  4. Moor subtrools are great and probably the most popular in Ontario area, but the readout takes up some space on your dash so be sure you have the room for it. I went with a depth raider (last year) mainly due to its smaller readout, takes up less space. I'm happy with it. Both use the coated rigger cable which tends to lose the coating--- but the coating can be repaired using liquid electrical tape. Cannon made a probe, but their speed sensor would not give accurate results at low speeds which we would be trolling at (read their manual for the details...I spoke with cannon last year and they confirmed this...maybe it's fixed in their newer models for 2013?)

    I've heard good reports on the fish hawks too and many charters use these, no coated cable but also the most expensive.

  5. I have a walker strikevision electric rigger and camera combo (that I was actually thinking about selling... Seems like we make it out a couple of times per year, and rarely put the camera on anymore.)

    Anyhow, get info and videos at: www.walkerdownriggers.com

    When i researched these, strikevision was the best one available. It uses a special rigger cable to send the video signal up. My only complaint, it takes some trial and error to get the camera to point directly on the lure.

    Another less expensive option, some cameras will attach to your rigger, but you have to hand feed the camera cable down, and them you have a lot of blowback from the drag.

    If you get one, I recommend strikevision.

  6. I never ran LC off boards, always just flatlined straight off the back, usually with a diver stickbait or sometimes a clean spoon. I never tried with a flasher, I imagine the extra drag would cause it to lose depth. Does my technique seem OK? I usually don't have boards with me in the summer. Wonder why I'm not hooking up much with it?

  7. I am going to respool my downrigger and non-stretch reels.

    I have 20 lb mono for the riggers, and ~20 lb dacron or ripcord (Cabelas) on the no-stretch/dipsey reels.

    In addition to Lake Ontario, I also fish Erie for walleye, so I prefer line that will work for both.

    I've had more breakoffs than usual this year...going out for opinions before I buy...

    What weight, type, and what brand lines do you like best?

    Would you use mono or a full spool of flurorcarbon on the dipsey rods?

    I think I've decided on Seaguar Premier fluorocarbon for the leaders. (20lb for salmon)

    mark

×
×
  • Create New...