Jump to content

CaptainEyes

Members
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CaptainEyes

  1. Justin, your fine, there never was any animosity on my end as I am learning this lake and am the type of person who needs to hear it from the horses mouth. Part of my education is talking to as many locals that fish the lake as possible(which may be a bad/good thing) and it is mind bogling the opinions and how they vary on each subject so I am a little apprehensive when it comes to opinions on Otisco lake plus I did ask a biologist though in passing if it was a put and take lake he said no but again that was in passing so I took it to heart.
  2. Agreed, and as long as we keep diaries for the DEC they can better adjust their stocking efforts to keep pace with the fishing pressure...
  3. Many individuals have been posting there fishing success on Otisco Lake which of course has spawned (no pun intended) healthy discussions such as catch & release and in my case the natural reproduction of the lakes walleyes. I decided if for no other reason than my own satisfaction to put the DEC on record as to the status of the lake and their view of a put & take fisheries and natural reproduction. I reached out to NYSDEC Fish & Wildlife Technician Ian Blackburn with a few questions below and you can view his answers in red. (Note: I did not inquire about the Nor lunge as they are a true definition of put&take sense they cannot reproduce) There are many discussions on line as to the fishery status of the lake and wondered where I can find the survey results? The electrofishing survey we conduct each fall is designed specifically to assess the survival of young of the year walleye that were stocked in the lake the preceding spring. We will be taking a look at the data from this survey over the winter and generally will not issue a report on the survey, instead using the information internally as one of our several tools to monitor the fishery in Otisco. The data, however, will be included in our statewide fisheries database, and we will occasionally provide highlights and significant findings on our web page for the lake. Anecdotally we did catch good numbers of this year's stocked fish below the causeway, and for the first time in years caught several of the 2013 fish in the main lake as well - indicating really good survival of this year class - be on the look out for them in 3-4 years...... Also a couple of burning questions that have been popping up without solid answers. 1) Does the DEC look at Otisco Lake as a "put and take" walleye fishery? Otisco is currently managed as a put/grow/take fishery for walleye due to the lack of their natural reproduction in the lake. 2) If yes than why only stock 44,000 as opposed to millions in lakes of similar size? We are currently stocking 50 day old fingerling walleye in Otisco, hence the smaller total numbers of fish compared to a lake like Oneida, which receives millions of 1-3 day old fry (much much smaller fish). The number we stock is derived from a standard # of fish per acre of water based on average carrying capacities of our waterbodies and other factors such as the size of the fish being stocked. 3) Is there natural reproduction of the walleye that are running up the streams to spawn? While the walleyes do run the streams along Otisco to spawn, the survival of newly hatched fry in the lake is minimal to none. For the past couple years we have marked the walleye we stock with OTC (Oxytetracycline), which can be seen in their otoliths (inner ear bones) in the laboratory under a scope, and I am not aware of any young of the year fish we've caught in our surveys that were not marked (they were all hatchery fish). 4) Some feel that the alewives have a negative effect on natural reproduction yet many who have fished the lake for 20-30 years state the number of alewives have decreased and with the introduction of the tiger musky and the explosion of small and large mouth bass makes sense. So what is your take? While the alewives may appear to be down compared to what you've observed in the past (we have not conducted forage surveys to assess this so can't make assumptions about how many are out there), it is still likely that the presence of alewives along with good numbers of white perch severelylimits any successful walleye reproduction in Otisco. Studies have been conducted documenting the detrimental effects of alewife on walleye fry - it's not just a hunch some folks have. We see the same thing in Jamesville Reservoir as well - great spawning stream/habitat there with Butternut Creek, yet no observable natural walleye reproduction. As a side note I had asked the put&take question to a different DEC individual in person and received a slightly different version however, this information is valuable and like many other fellow anglers I will continue to keep legal walleye for the dinner table and my first 45" Nor lunge will go on the wall!
  4. Justin, I dont think nor did I ever intend for my comments to be misconstrude that Otisco is being overharvested. I surely dont catch (or fish as much) as you and I normally keep every legal Walleye I catch as well. I am more interested in if the lake does have natural reproduction and to what degree. You see, things like that really intrique me... When I go home (to wellsville NY) I go up in these big hills and fish these streams that are no more than 3ft wide for wild beautiful brooke trout that are no more than 4"-6" (and release them) and think man these things are wild and naturally reproduce and I gain a better sense of accomplishment and feeling of the wild outdoors. So, if a body of water is put and take than by all means take all the legal ones we can however, if it does have natural reproduction then maybe we do need to take that into consideration. For my own sanity I did email Ian this morning and asked him to comment on exactly just that so in my mind(no one elses) I can feel good about my conservation efforts. Again, I like these discussions and have learned from them. Brent
  5. Tim, that is some good information you and Justin shared... It is a little different than what I was told at the meeting but then again they said they were not going to survey the lake until 2014 for budget reasons. I personally have no issues with keeping fish as I enjoy eating them as well just thought the natural reproduction was better than what has been expressed by a few on here. I also maintain a diary and did meet Ian at the meeting however my questions were directed towards David Lemon.. These kind of discussions can only help solidify the actualities of the health of the fisheries and and Otisco Lake.. Good Fishing, Brent
  6. Justin I enjoy your posts and understand that your just trying relay your experiences but you left the door open on this and it's actually good discussion which I can/should start another thread as not to tread on yours however bigger fish eat alewives and they aren't wiped out it's just the food chain. I don't defer much to the DEC especially when it comes to deer management but fisheries is definitely a biologist thing and if they say it's not a put and take lake than who are we as individuals who only take from the lake to think otherwise?
  7. Joe, You will get no debate here on the keep and eat they are delicious and I'm all for it as long as they are legal and within the limits. I let one go last night just because I was getting tired and too lazy to filet it. I attended a DEC seminar last February (on otisco lake) and I asked them the question is Otisco a put and take lake and in there opinion they said no we do a minimum stock to give it a boost. Several years ago they thought the lake was 100% sustainable and stopped stocking it all together. That is one of the reasons why they are performing a study in the spring to get a better handle on the natural reproduction. What happened to Conesus?? I just moved from Canandaigua and I can remember going down there in the spring and watching 10lb+ slobs you could walk on there backs spawning the stream. Doesnt the DEC have a station there they get eggs from or is that on Honeyoe? I forget..
  8. Justin, I built a new barn this summer and have been busy with that and work. as a matter of fact I am going out of town the rest of this week .. I am not set up for trolling (i will be next year) so I try to time it when the fish are in shallow and I can throw my stick baits, crank bait. I didnt think anyone was out last night but I see you were must be you were down the lake farther. I started a quarter of the way down the lake on the west side didnt catch a thing then moved over to east side and caught 2 small mouths and one eye before calling it a night. Brent
  9. I am not getting in the middle on keeping/releasing fish it is a personal choice and how can you blame someone for keeping them they are delicious... However, I have heard a couple different times people stating that Otisco is a put and take walleye fisherie (im not picking on you BSmaster just using your post) and that could not be further from the truth... The lake does have some natural reproduction the DEC only stocks 44,000 1" fingerlings a year with a less than 10% survival rate so do the math. Delta lake which is a true put and take fisherie recieve over 5million fingerlings a year and is around the same size as Otisco. Also though many anglers choose to release them the Tigers on Otisco are technically a put and take fish as they do not reproduce. The DEC is planning a study on Otisco in 2014 to get a better picture of the fisherie status so stay tuned
  10. After a long hiatus from the lake due to building a new barn I finally made it out on the water last night. Now I am not one of those outdoorsman who goes out to enjoy the outdoors meaning, when I'm deer hunting I am out there to get a deer when I am turkey hunting I am out there to kill a bird etc. but my gosh (the lake seemed empty of boats and other fisherman) what a beautiful night be out and enjoy Otisco Lake... I was able to net one 21" eye around 10:30pm which I released. I wish I could of stayed out all night but I have this damn thing called work that makes me get up early... I think some of the best fishing is yet to come which is fine with me because I do not get all amped up over the 10/1 start to bow season...
  11. Normaly I would say there is no real need to shoot small bucks but that's for another spread however, I knew I would get a replica mount reply.. When it comes to musky's I agree with you as they are a reproductive fish the caviat is the fight time, amount of time the fish is out of the water for accurate length/width measurements and good pictures all have an adverse effect on the fish and many are released to die. These Norlunge do not reproduce are a put and take fish and I believe the real mounts do look better and per my taxadermist last just as long.
  12. Funny you should say that about not being prepared to keep a fish that big.. First off Kelly and I were on the lake Sunday and we understand the battle you went through. We were actually down by where you caught it, me throwing a multitude of lures while Kelly read her book. Aafter many many boats drove by and jetskis kept circling around we picked up and moved closer to the causeway and proceeded to go through a dozen worms on gills and perch which I think she caught more than I. However after sending out the post to you last night she looked at me and said "honey what are you going to do when you catch a fish that big? and your by yourself" ???? Hmmmm well the livewell is too small and though her father lives on the lake its not a good idea to have a norlunge flopping around so thanks Justin you just gave me another reason to hit Bass Pro and spend more money..lol
  13. I realize the DEC's goal is to have record Norlunge (as I call them) come out this lake every year (and most sportsman have bought into this) however, they are the true definition of a put and take fish and my personal goal of one 44" or bigger will go on the wall with no regrets. So I hope she gets another one just as big or bigger and you break out your wallet...
  14. Nice week I had a great week myself. How many of the breeder walleyes did you put back?
  15. So last weekend was your first weekend of walleye fishing that you didnt catch one? I'm going with you.lol I attended the DEC seminar in February and they defiantley do not consider Otisco a "put and take" walley lake like a Delta Lake they do consider Otisco a "good" walley lake. The DEC even quit stocking Otisco for a 3yr period 5 or 6 years ago but found both the walleye and tiger musky population decreased. They were planning on a full fish survey in 2013 but due to funding they are pushing it back to 2014. I took 9 days off and got back on the water Monday night with a couple of buddies we didnt troll but did manage to catche a 20" walleye and lost another at the boat. What a difference 9 days makes I didnt see another boat on the water and only a few people were fishing off shore.
  16. I took the weekend off but was afraid its getting to be that time of the year on Otisco where you just cant catch a walleye. It's frustrating because the bait fish is still in close to shore but the eyes belly seem to be full.. I'm not sure what the answers are but I am eager for the 2014 DEC fish survey just to find out what is truly going on in the lake... I personally believe that even with the natural reproduction in the lake that 44,000 released fingerlings a year just isnt enough especially when you look at Delta Lake (similar in size to Otisco) receives 5million fingerlings a year.
  17. I like using lead core with or without boards just like you would on Erie..
×
×
  • Create New...