-
Posts
2,784 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by L&M
-
Attention Wayne County http://www.thetimesofwaynecounty.com/in ... tured-news When the New York Power Authority revealed ambitious plans to install offshore wind turbines out on Lake Ontario and portions of Lake Erie, some counties such as Niagara and Erie voiced support for the project. Job creation and clean energy were touted as solid reasoning behind the suggestions. After all, European countries have utilized offshore wind turbines as a vital source of power for years. The flat, unobstructed, high wind capturing turbines seemed like a simple answer for future energy needs. On December 1, 2009 NYPA released a request for proposals for the development of offshore wind power projects in Lake Erie and Lake Ontario. The size and exact location for these projects is yet to be determined. A map released by NYPA depicts portions of the Lake Ontario shoreline in Wayne County as potential locations for offshore wind farms. NYPA describes the project as “a utility-scale offshore wind farm between 120 mw and 500 mw total capacity.†NYPA President Richard M. Kessel indicated refusal to allow these off shore behemoths would turn away thousands of manufacturing and service jobs for the Upstate area. With all the promise of good, why did several lake shore counties already nix the project? “My personal feeling is that I am totally against them,†said Sodus Supervisor Steve LeRoy. “I think this is a terrible exploitation of that lake and I do not see it happening.†LeRoy said that Wayne County spends a good deal of money on tourism and that the offshore wind turbines would spoil the lake views for everybody He added that what he believes would be the final 400 foot towers could probably be seen from the other side of the lake on clear days. “There would be no benefit to us (Wayne County) or our local economy once the electricity generated hits the grid. It won’t lower our electric bills,†said LeRoy. The Sodus Supervisor pointed out that Lake Ontario drops off drastically miles offshore and that the cost of the sub-structure for the wind turbines would probably offset any savings in the cost of energy. Both Oswego and Jefferson Counties to the east of Wayne County have already rejected the NYPA proposals and according to Williamson Supervisor/Board Chairman Jim Hoffman, Kessel informed the Counties at a regional presentation of the project that the NYPA would not build where there was opposition. Kessel said there were enough communities who wanted the project. A Wayne County resolution opposing the project was tabled at the March 16th Board of Supervisors meeting in favor of obtaining input from the public prior to Board action. Wayne County residents are invited to attend a public hearing to provide comments concerning the NYPA Great Lakes Offshore Wind Project. The public hearing will be held on March 31, 2010 at 7 PM at the Wayne County Courthouse, 26 Church Street in Lyons. Chairman Hoffman said, “It is our hope that residents with opinions pertaining to this proposed wind turbine project will attend the public hearing on March 31, 2010 and share their concerns with the Board of Supervisors.†The due date to accept the NYPA proposals is June 1, 2010. If you can not attend the meeting please contact one of the board members to express your opinion!! http://www.co.wayne.ny.us/departments/brdsuper.htm
-
Last I heard a few days ago. It's still wide open up there.
-
Great new's Lew.
-
Don't run it Sean (copper) so I can't vouch for that. Andy will be up in a couple week's and I'll show him what & how they work and send a few your way.
-
Yes they are the same as Amish sells but they don't have to be purchased there, nor are they used with a rubber band as they show. Very simple & efficient release at a reasonable price. No need to bring them in, let them slide down & send another behind it or if you want to switch a lure in the middle of a spread just pop the rod tip to release & send another lure out.
-
Sounds like a perfect recipe for a permanently floor mounted fish box ta me.
-
Welcome aboard.
-
Change it in your profile 82.
-
By David Figura/The Post-Standard March 16, 2010, 5:37AM The following is a press release. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Pete Grannis today invited hunters to submit recommendations to regional Waterfowl Hunter Task Forces for the dates of the fall 2010 duck hunting seasons. DEC will evaluate the task force recommendations in setting waterfowl seasons, which must comply with federal rules. New York is divided into five waterfowl hunting zones: Western, Southeastern, Northeastern, Lake Champlain, and Long Island. DEC recently appointed task forces for each zone (except Lake Champlain, see link below) to solicit recommendations for the fall 2010 hunting seasons, including opening and closing dates, split seasons and a special hunting weekend for youths. Each task force includes representatives from the New York State Conservation Council, established waterfowl hunting organizations and individual waterfowl hunters who were chosen to provide input. The recommended dates must be within federal guidelines established by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). For fall 2010, DEC expects the USFWS to allow a 60-day duck season, split into no more than two segments per zone, opening no earlier than Sept. 25, 2010, and closing no later than Jan. 30, 2011. Waterfowl hunters can participate by providing duck season suggestions to any task force member on or before March 25, 2010. Names and contact information for all task force members are listed in alphabetical order in the attached table and on the DEC website. Comments can be provided by mail, telephone or e-mail. The comment due date is important because the task forces will meet in late March and April and DEC plans to announce tentative duck hunting season dates in June. Input on hunting seasons for other migratory game birds, including Canada geese, snow geese, brant and woodcock, may be submitted also to any member of DEC's season-setting team. However, due to greater uncertainty about federal regulations for those species, decisions and tentative dates will probably not be known until later in the summer. Waterfowl seasons in the Lake Champlain Zone will continue to be set by the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Management Board, with input from DEC and waterfowl hunters in New York and Vermont. Although there is no formal task force for this zone, hunters can send their suggestions to any DEC season-setting team member on the attached list. Descriptions of New York State's waterfowl hunting zones can be found on the DEC website and are also listed in DEC's Waterfowl Hunting Seasons and Regulations brochure. The tentative waterfowl hunting season dates will be posted on the DEC website and announced by news release in June. http://www.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/42364.html
-
Big block or Small?
-
Clipper Releases Tom. No rubber band required.
-
Never say never. A standard transducer will, in most instances shoot thu & work ( altho with varied results ) in a smaller single layer aluminum hull boat. Radarsonics also makes a transducer for exactly that purpose. http://www.radarsonics.com/AlumaDucer.htm As was asked I would try with that unit first and see what the results were and if not adequate go with a different mounting option. Silicon would give that option.
-
Hum. Did ya catch the bandit ?
-
Half hitch band around main line at the point you are going to put it in the release. The resulting loop in the band goes inside the curtain hook & hook clipped around plainer line.
-
Clear silicone should do the job for ya Rick. The least amount with no air bubble's, to hold it in place the better.
-
Your both correct Tohatsu & Nisson are one in the same. Tohatsu also manufactures many smaller engines for other name brand company's as-well. Excellent quality engines all the way around.
-
Welcome George
-
Happy Birthday there teach. Have a good one Bud
-
TV info tonight on Great lakes & ocean Govt fishing policy
L&M replied to big easy's topic in Open Lake Discussion
Obama intent on ending recreational fishing in America? Column generates a strong reaction -- and a correction. By David Figura/The Post-Standard March 13, 2010, 9:29AM I've received more than a dozen emails from concerned local outdoorsmen this past week saying Pres. Obama is intent on ending recreational fishing in this country -- directing my attention to an ESPN.com column written by Robert Montgomery of ESPN Outdoors, entitled "Culled Out. Public input for federal fishing strategy has ended." The Field and Stream web site, however, described Montgomery's piece and the message it carried as "a farce." In addition, the ESPN.com editor this week issued an apology and posted a correction concerning Montgomery's column. Montgomery's piece begins: "The Obama administration has ended public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing some of the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters. "Fishing industry insiders, who have negotiated for months with officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task force, had grown concerned that the public input would not be taken into account." One reader said he heard Glen Beck mention the column this week on his show. Read the complete version of Montgomery's column. ESPN Outdoors Executive Editor Steve Bowman's statement in regard to Montgomery's piece follows: "ESPNOutdoors.com inadvertently contributed to a flare-up Tuesday when we posted the latest article in a series of stories on President Barack Obama's newly created Ocean Policy Task Force, a column written by Robert Montgomery, a conservation writer for BASS since 1985. Regrettably, we made several errors in the editing and presentation of this installment. Though our series has included numerous news stories on the topic, this was not one of them -- it was an opinion piece, and should have been clearly labeled as commentary. And while our series overall has examined several sides of the topic, this particular column was not properly balanced and failed to represent contrary points of view. We have reached out to people on every side of the issue and reported their points of view -- if they chose to respond -- throughout the series, but failed to do so in this specific column." The Obama administration has since issued a statement saying it has no such plans to end recreational fishing.. And Trout Unlimited, the Field and Stream web site reported, on Friday issued the following statement: "Dear TU Supporters: "We wanted to take a moment to respond to a number of you who have written to us this week concerning an ESPN piece that appeared on the ESPN Outdoors website about the draft proposal recently published by the President's Ocean Policy Task Force. The first sentence in the piece said the following: "The Obama administration has ended public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing some of the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters." "...The confusion over the ESPN article led the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), the coordinating entity for federal environmental efforts, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA), to issue the following statements (from Eric Schwaab, NOAA's Assistant Administrator for the National Marine Fisheries Service) "The Ocean Policy Task Force has not recommended a ban on recreational fishing. The draft reports by the Ocean Policy Task Force do not contain a zoning map and do not establish any restrictions on recreational fishing, nor make any judgments about whether one ocean activity or use is better than another. Instead, the reports set up a policy and framework for effectively managing the many sustainable uses of the ocean while upholding our responsibility to be stewards of our oceans, coasts and Great Lakes. As a member of the task force, NOAA Administrator Dr. Jane Lubchenco, has said, and I echo her on this, that saltwater recreational fishing is vital to this nation and NOAA is committed to building a strong partnership with America's saltwater anglers to ensure that Americans have opportunities to fish sustainably for generations to come." "Saltwater recreational fishing matters to me on a personal level as a recreational fisherman, it matters to millions of Americans who enjoy this great sport and it matters to our economy. Our most recent economic report shows it supports a half million jobs and generates $82 billion in sales each year. NOAA is committed to adopting policies that will ensure that current and future generations have the opportunity to enjoy the great tradition of recreational fishing." "In our view, there is no evidence that the Obama Administration intended to use the work of the Ocean Task Force to undercut marine sport fishing." The Field and Stream web site concludes: "At least one good thing might have come out of this farce: if the administration wasn't paying attention to the concerns voiced by recreational anglers before, you can bet it is now. And that's a good thing regardless of who's in office." http://blog.syracuse.com/outdoors/2010/ ... creat.html -
I think you misunderstood the # of leg's Bob. ps: You also missed the part where ya need a permit to carry dogs onboard.
-
C&P from an earlier post. L & M: I noticed your reply referenced Parks and Recreation....so I looked on their site....here is the regulation they referred me to: Navigation Law Updates Life Jacket Wear Requirements Beginning November 1, 2009, Section 40, Subdivision 1 of the Navigation Law shall be amended by adding new paragraph (e), which reads as follows: No owner or operator of a pleasure vessel less than twenty-one feet, including rowboats, canoes, and kayaks shall permit its operation, between November first and May first, unless each person on board such vessel is wearing a securely fastened United States Coast Guard approved wearable personal flotation device of an appropriate size when such vessel is underway. Failure to wear a lifejacket on such vessels will be considered a violation under Section 73-c if the Navigation Law and is punishable by a fine of not less than $25 nor more than $100, applicable to either the operator and/or the owner of the vessel. *** So I called them, specifically to clarify the "underway". They said while the vessel is at anchor you do not need to keep the PFD on (except as it applies to children). Also, it does apply to Lake's Erie and Ontario, also as I suspected it did. Thanks for the replys. Guess I have my answers. John _________________ Capt. John Forbes Times Two Charters
-
With thermostats

