Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Lucky13

Members
  • Content Count

    729
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lucky13

  1. How much except the license fee, and the Pittman Robertson money is actually available to use for "the maintenance of the fishery?" Seems to me that all the rest of that "revenue" ends up in private pockets.
  2. Lucky13

    Salmon Run

    Three weeks ago there were fish cutting redds, fair numbers of hens around. Two weeks there were lots of solitary males around did not see a fish cutting in three days. Last week saw next to nothing except really zombie males, but the water went up after 1/2 day. I think the bulk of the salmon have come and gone, although a friend who works in the hatchery said there were still a few freshies in the ladder.
  3. Lucky13

    Weird Steelhead Skeins

    I caught a brown trout in Hemlock Lake a few years back that had the strangest color markings I had ever seen. I thought maybe it was a tiger trout, a brown brook hybrid. I sketched it as I did not have a camera. The DEC biologist with whom I spoke said they see all kinds of strange pigmentation. He also said that, just like with people, in any large population, some individuals will develop diseases. Maybe (and lets hope) that is what is showing here, not the beginnings of some new disease from somewhere else that came in on a boat, or in some of that “harmless” bait people think it is all right to haul from the Atlantic or down south. But I agree that it is important to document this stuff, and communicate it, as if it is problematic, the biologists have the heads up earlier rather than later.
  4. DEC Stocks Lake Sturgeon into Upstate Waters State's Multi-Year Effort to Restore Threatened Species Showing Success New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Basil Seggos announced today that fisheries staff are busily stocking state-threatened lake sturgeon into several New York waters this month. The stocking effort is designed to help restore this threatened species. Commissioner Seggos said, "DEC's biologists and technicians are releasing sturgeon into waters these fish historically inhabited. Working with our local and federal partners, New York is bringing sturgeon back. I am proud of our hatchery employees and the work they do and happy to report that the project is successful." Approximately 4,000 lake sturgeon are being stocked this month. These fish were raised from eggs taken on the New York Power Authority property at the Moses-Saunders Power Project at Massena, NY, and raised at DEC's Oneida Hatchery in Constantia. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Geological Survey were also involved in the egg take. Some of the eggs were taken to the Genoa National Fish Hatchery in Genoa, WI, where they were hatched, and the young sturgeon reared there are now returning to New York waters. Some of the fish to be stocked are being tagged for future identification. Passive Integrated Transponder tags ("PIT tags") are inserted under the skin into juvenile sturgeon. These are unique identifier tags like the ones placed in pets. They allow fishery biologists to identify individual fish over time as they are encountered in future sampling. October stocking efforts bring to fruition a cooperative, multi-year project. DEC has been actively working with federal, tribal, and university partners on protecting and restoring lake sturgeon throughout New York for more than 20 years. Beginning in 1993, DEC reared small numbers of eggs at the Oneida Hatchery. In 1995, nearly 18,000 fish were raised to six inches in size at the Oneida hatchery and released into Oneida, Cayuga, and Black lakes and the Grasse and upper Oswegatchie rivers. Hatchery fish were stocked in most years from 1995 to 2006, in these and other locations. Once abundant in the Great Lakes, Lake Champlain, and adjacent watersheds, lake sturgeon populations declined precipitously due to overharvest, declining water quality, and the placement of dams that restricted movement to spawning grounds. Efforts to clean up Great Lakes waters have been successful to date and sturgeon populations are now on the rise. Sturgeon harvest in the Great Lakes peaked in 1885. Lake sturgeon were prized for their eggs as caviar and the meat was smoked. The swim bladder organ of sturgeon was used to make isinglass, a gelatin used in brewing beer and wine. An ancient species that first appeared in the fossil record when dinosaurs roamed the Earth, lake sturgeon are native to the Mississippi River Basin, Great Lakes Basin, and Hudson Bay region of North America. Primitive in appearance, lake sturgeon have torpedo-shaped bodies covered with five rows of bony plates called "scutes." They are the largest fish native to the Great Lakes, growing to seven or more feet in length and weighing up to 300 pounds. A specimen that was 7 ft. 4 in. long, weighing 240 pounds, was found in Lake Erie in 1998. Lake sturgeon from New York's inland waters are smaller on average and may grow to as much three to five feet in length and 80 pounds as adults. These fish feed on the bottom and eat primarily aquatic insects, worms, snails, clams, and crayfish. Specimens caught in Oneida Lake have also been found to consume zebra mussels. Larger sturgeon have also been found to consume round gobies. One thousand sturgeon averaging about six inches long will be stocked into the following waters: Black Lake; Oswegatchie River; St. Regis River; Raquette River; Salmon River; and Genesee River. Approximately 500 lake sturgeon will be stocked in Oneida Lake and the St. Lawrence River at Massena. Two-thousand-five-hundred fish will be stocked into Chaumont Bay, Cayuga Lake, and the St. Lawrence River at Ogdensburg. While DEC and partners have discovered gravid or egg-bearing females and young fish in previously stocked locations, DEC will continue propagation of lake sturgeon through 2024. Low levels of stocking are continuing to enhance the genetic structure of previously stocked populations. Sturgeon are infrequent spawners and use the same gravel and cobble beds as do walleye. They congregate in tributary streams in late May to mid-June. Only about 10 percent of the population spawns in any given year. Males reach maturity at about age 15, and spawn only every second or third year. Females mature at about 20 years of age and spawn only every four to seven years. Bottom fishing with worms is likely to attract sturgeon, so that practice should be avoided in sturgeon waters. If an angler accidentally hooks a sturgeon, they should release it as quickly as possible and try not to remove it from the water. Always support its full weight across its abdomen; do NOT hang it by the gills or tail. Do not touch its gills or eyes. For more information on lake sturgeon, visit DEC's website. http://www.dec.ny.gov/press/77537.html
  5. Based on the SOL reports, no domestics go in the pens at Hamlin or Sandy, and the last time Washington Strain fish, which also run in the fall, were pen raised in Sandy (although the 2018 data is not available yet) was 2014. Sometimes when I attempt to do my research I only get partial information returned, so I am limited to the sources out there in print. But glad to hear you have a strong group, and don't need any additional help, and thanks for the efforts. And thanks for the tip for later fall!
  6. The elitism got pitched at me before I pitched any back. Domestic rainbows are not often caught by anyone far up a tributary either, as they generally spawn close to the lake. According to DEC, they are Lake stocked as well. This is the first I have ever heard of Randolph fish going into the pens. Do they truck from two hatcheries on the same day, or do you have to take delivery on separate days? A separate pen for the domestics, and another for the Chambers Creek fish from Altmar? If Sam needs bodies, I am sure I'll find plenty to do in Rochester. Just pointing out that it is hard to complain about a lack of volunteers if only certain people (definition of an elite) hear about it.
  7. There is about 1 mile of public access to the stream, of about 17 miles of stream. And not everyone is snagging and lifting, anymore than all the trollers have been "power trolling" j-plugs for the last 2 months.
  8. But the complaints have been about lack of new blood, and tributary anglers, and if it is only notice by e-mail, only those already connected get notice. I saw things here last year but they were short notice, and I was already committed on the days announced. I am also not really likely to get out to Sandy as I can be in Sodus in less time from where I live, and Sandy is an extremely limited tributary in terms of public access.
  9. I'll make sure Sam has my contact information.
  10. I volunteered to feed in Rochester some years ago. I went down to Shumway with my daughter for my first assigned shift, and everything was fine. When I got there for the second one, someone else had already done the feeding. Very disappointed young lady. This was right after they started using premeasured bags of food. Tried a third time, already fed again, tried to call coordinator, no return call. Then the fish went in, not informed until afterward. I tried to sign up the next year, no calls returned. Lately, with Sam running it, my understanding is that things are running more smoothly, but to really get the volunteers, more lead time is necessary, and a central coordination point for each pen would be better than, “ Hey, we need help this Saturday AM at Sandy Creek” on Thursday afternoon, in a post on LOU. Maybe two months out, start a sign-up roster with phone and e-mail, and then send an e-mail with tentative schedule, so that people can try to hold time. And also realize that some of us volunteer at other places, too, I’m doing a lot of time at a second hand clothing ministry on Saturdays, when it is hard to get volunteers, and with most folks working, Saturday is generally the bullwork days on the pens as well. I’ve also put in considerable time on tree planting in the Genesee Watershed the last few years and that goes on, usually on Saturdays, during the same timeframe. Finally, when you want strong backs, you are looking for younger people,, and they seem to be the rarest ones in any volunteer pool lately.
  11. I'm pretty sure that is what everyone wants to see, but no one has developed it, and, more importantly, ground truthed it against existing data to the level of confidence that is out there for the trawls.
  12. If you got the handout last night, I have an earlier one, from July, and Steve pointed out both verbally in the presentation, not to pick nits or anything.
  13. How do you know the number or density of fish producing the “ mark(s)” on the screen, except by what you haul up with the trawl? Steve said last night that if someone could produce a reliable quality controlled “sonar” or “ hydroacoustic” method, they would be the first to use it. There is an unscientific “leap of faith” between the mark(s) on the screen and a numerical value. The folks at the Cornell Research Facility have been using and attempting to perfect hydroacoustics for many years now, but it is my sense that the techniques are still only capable of providing supplementary information, and the primary and “ truthing” information must still be obtained by trawling
  14. Please see “A Technical Review of the Lake Ontario Forage Base Assessment Program. MacNeill, D.B. 2005. New York Sea Grant Extension Program, Oswego, NY. 42pp.” (https://seagrant.sunysb.edu/glsportfish/pdfs/forageassess05.pdf) for an examination of the science of the trawls and the levels of confidence to be expected. This is an extremely well vetted and high quality monitoring program with a great deal of science involved. If science had to produce complete certainty before action could be taken based on its conclusions, we would still be living in the stone age. Such everyday occurrences as vaccination or use of x rays for diagnostics, even employment of internal combustion engines, would never have been implemented because not all of the risks or uncertainties could have been overcome. The trawl program is designed, as closely as possible in a variable environment, to repeat sampling methodologies which yield, after rigorous analysis, information about age structure, growth and condition , and spatial distribution and numbers of alewife in Lake Ontario. Combined with other scientific monitoring activities of NYSDEC and other agencies such as USGS and USEPA, scientists can at least have some knowledge of state of the lake and its overall health and potential for sustaining fish populations. What is the alternative, throw a bunch of fish in the water and see how they do? I will contend that if that had been the program since the inception of Salmon stocking in 1968, the salmon would have likely been gone for good before 2000, especially if NYSDEC and OMNR had followed the ‘Stock more and more” clamor that was heard in the 90’s, when the first indications of alewife decline, likely in response to the shift in trophic state of the lake, were seen. The trawl data as presented in terms of numbers and year classes is one of the measures, but in a more detailed paper that was provided to the Great Lakes Fisheries Commission stakeholders group, and as was stated by Steve Lapan last night for those who were listening, “growth and condition of alewife declined across all age classes, meaning less energy transferred to predators for every alewife eaten,” and “ New York and Ontario anglers noted smaller Chinook salmon in 2018. Angler creel data confirm smaller lengths, weights, and ‘body condition”(weight for a given length or ”plumpness”) of Chinook Salmon in July and August.” Again, what is the alternative? And, even if the wonderful conditions reported for the west end of the lake are all true, what about the remainder of the lake, especially the Canadian side, where conditions reported by the GLFC group were vastly different than those touted by the west end charter captains. So maybe the science is not perfect, but I’ve seen nothing that says watching TV is better.
  15. I think Gator responded accurately on the number of trawls in the Canadian waters, with the additional observation that that facet of the program is still in its infancy. And, honestly, even near the front it was hard to hear with the “separate meeting” being rudely held by some of the “professionals” in the back of the room, which I thought was crowded even if the turnout could have been much bigger (it was certainly larger than two years ago, when a handful of us gathered in the Greece Town Hall.) Maybe it was due to all the chatter that you missed the additional information on the trawl duration change, that Dr. Weidel of USGS ran comparable 5 and 10 minute trawls for two years prior to the shift, that demonstrated that results for a 5 minute trawl are comparable, not significantly different, to a 10 minute trawl, and that shortening the time of the trawl allowed for a greater number of tows for the same effort and expenditure. I am sure we will see greater detail on all this at the SOL in the spring, and Steve LaPan did indicate that he had hoped to have Dr Weidel at this meeting, but he is out on the lake doing fall survey work, I couldn‘t hear what it was for, though. Dave Figura from the Syracuse papers was there, and stayed for the whole meeting. I am sure based on past reading of his columns, that the Syracuse paper will have a good summary for those who could not attend. Too bad the Rochester papers don’t see any value at all in the fishery or any outdoor pursuits any more ( although Leo Roth did get an article in last week announcing the meeting), or you might see something from closer to the meeting location. Bill Hilts Jr was also there, but left at some point during the meeting. It is possible that he missed a fair part of the presentation, because it was repeatedly interrupted with what at first were reasonable questions, maybe better held to the end, and then by less civil interruptions that mainly (to my ears) amounted to attacks on the DEC, at which point Steve Hurst, DEC Director of Fisheries, cut off questions until; the presentation was completed. It should be emphasized that this is not a popular action even within DEC, but they are taking a conservative approach to what they view as increasing instability in the adult alewife population to continue to stay ahead of what could develop into a catastrophic collapse of the King salmon population if the “ Hole” in the adult alewife population continues to deepen . It should also be remembered that in the committee of professional fisheries scientists that reached this decision, 50% of the participants wanted a 50% cut in King stocking, rather than the 40% cut that is being taken, and one Canadian scientist has recommended elimination of king stocking altogether until the alewife population stabilizes, as was said last night. And, bottom line, there are still 2.7 million sportfish being stocked into the lake, with a very large contingent of naturally reproduced king salmon as well.
  16. Lucky13

    CAYUGA weekend

    Cool, I was thinking Saturday and Sunday, forgot about IP day, or an early start!
  17. Lucky13

    CAYUGA weekend

    So you posted pix of a two day limit for two people of silvers taken this past weekend off Fairhaven AND you boxed all these fish from Cayuga on Sunday AM?
  18. Boy, you will get into big trouble with Captains Songin and Perlioni with that statement, LOL! They maintain the steelhead are responsible for bad second year alewife numbers! I am still sticking with the notion that the only significant natural reproduction on the south shore is the Salmon River. The remainder of the tributaries are too warm in the summer. On the Canadian side, there is definitely a need for better data. Tuesday will be very interesting, if only to get everyone on the same page about plans that apparently have been discussed with one committee but not the general public.
  19. Doesn’t anyone read anything anymore? We are in the midst of a three years clipped coho study, that is why they want the heads, as many of the clipped fish also had coded wire tags. http://www.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/112942.html They did a full three year king salmon study when they first bought the trailer. The results of this study were published years ago. From the 2015 SOL Summery: (http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/fish_marine_pdf/lorpt15.pdf) Also the 2014 study, section 3. (http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/fish_marine_pdf/lorpt14.pdf) “In 2008, the DEC purchased an automated fish marking trailer (AutoFish) capable of adiposeclipping and/or applying coded wire tags (CWTs) to salmon and trout automatically at a high rate of speed and accuracy. From 2008-2011, DEC and the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry “mass-marked” all stocked Chinook salmon with an adipose fin clip in Lake Ontario to determine the relative contributions of wild and hatchery stocked Chinook salmon to the fishery. To evaluate the relative performance of pen-reared and traditional, shore-stocked Chinook salmon, DEC marked sub-samples of Chinooks stocked at pen-rearing sites with CWTs in 2010, 2011, and 2013 (Section 3). For the four year classes studied to determine the relative contribution of wild Chinook to the fishery (2008-2011 year classes), percentages of wild Chinook salmon in Lake Ontario varied by year class, age, and among regions from 2009-2015, but overall wild Chinook were an important component of the Lake Ontario fishery averaging 47% of the age 2-and age-3 lake harvest. The percentages of wild Chinook salmon in New York tributaries also varied among regions from 2009-2015 with percentages of age 2-3 wild salmon averaging 7.5% in western region tributaries, 18% in eastern region tributaries, and 58% in the Salmon River. “ Steelhead have not been done at all, so I would hope they would use the technology to evaluate that population before getting redundant with the Kings
  20. Lucky13

    Rochester walleye

    One of the biggest takeaway's from Matt's report is that there is next to no one fishing for walleye in I Bay. DEC has stocked bunch of fish, they find the adults in the gill nets and electrofishing, but the anger surveys say the fishery is totally underutilized.
  21. Lucky13

    Rochester walleye

    I didn't get it off the internet, it was e-mailed to me. It contains surveying done in 205, 2010, and 2015. Standard techniques like gill netting and electrofishing, and comparisons to other lakes done the same way. Must be nice to be so knowledgeable as to be able to cherry pick the data! It does contain stocking data for the last 15 or so years, and some of the guys who actually fish Irondequoit Bay were interested in that.
  22. Lucky13

    Rochester walleye

    Matt Sanderson has a new report on I-Bay out, a lot of detail on gamefish. I tried to attach it but I think it is too large, but you may be able to get a copy from Region 8 in Avon.
  23. Likely a very good question for a week from tonight, but I know the process in place for regulations changes is not rapid.
  24. I will be sorry to miss this but it is a long drive home to Rochester in the dark.
  25. "With stocking issues, the adult population is only going to drop more. If the levels drop below the target, don't be surprised if the lake trout stockings increase over kings." Let me see if I can get this straight. We have issues with stocking i.e. we are not getting enough little fish from the Feds to meet quotas, so the Lake trout adult population is declining, so we should expect to see more stocking. But we can’t get enough little lake trout now, what makes you think they will suddenly materialize because a “goal” changes? You should also remember that the consensus document, the Fish Community Objectives, contains the lake trout as the top BENTHIC predator, along with the King as the top PELAGIC predator, so it is unrealistic to expect the lake trout to get phased out in favor of more and more kings. Also, Lake Ontario is governed by more entities than the State of New York, both the United States and Canadian Federal entities have jurisdiction, as well as the Province of Ontario, and native species restoration is a priority at the Federal level because the thought is that it is not possible to make the judgement that the resource, Lake Ontario, has recovered from the multiple stressors to which it has been subjected over the last 100+ years if the native flora and fauna are not present, and at least on the road to recovery. So Lake Trout are a priority and indicator for the Lake Ontario Action and Management Plan (LAMP), and will continue to be “pushed” by the Federal entities. I know that DEC management follows these conversations, so I would expect that we will see a detailed table of what is expected to be stocked in 2019 under this scenario, and I have been told that the 20% cut still occurs to Lake Trout. Finally, I get this sense that at least part of the Charter Industry sees some “vast conspiracy” against the kings, and I wonder about that. What “profit” is there for Andy and Steve to shift the population demographics of LO fish? Why is it so hard to buy the idea that these guys would rather see a thriving, if somewhat smaller (and with SR natural reproduction and Canadian (unmeasured) natural reproduction, likely less than 20% less) predator base, until stability returns to the adult alewife population, than to carry the legacy into the future that they had the helm when LO “slid” the way Michigan or even Huron has. I’ll remind you of Bob Lange, at the Fisheries Congress, when participating anglers indicated they wanted lots of big salmon AND healthy warm water fisheries like perch (Bob saw these as mutually exclusive), and did not want to see any stocking cuts regardless of stress on the alewife, telling the gathered participants that if there was a crash to the bait, responsibility would fall squarely on their shoulders, not the shoulders of management.
×