Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fishnut

  1. Fishnut

    Taughhannock Launch Status?

    Way to go. I’m so jealous. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  2. I’d pay 20 with shipping? Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  3. I’d pay 40 for the boards shipped??? Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  4. Fishnut

    What size dipseys

    124’s for high divers. Magnums for low divers. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  5. Fishnut

    Spring bite

    I fish Oak Orchard in the spring for Browns. We fish shallow 20 FOW or less. Spoons off planners, shallow stick bates off riggers set at 3 to 5 feet ,100 to 150 behind the ball. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  6. Fishnut

    Sold / Closed 2 GIMBAL MOUNTS

    ill take them if you will ship and take Paypal??
  7. Fishnut

    Teaching resources

    Iv been an observer for a couple years, yes it really takes a lot of the curve out of the learning curve. I also just ordered 2 of keatings books. last year was my first year chasing kings and we did really well.
  8. Fishnut

    Weigh in

    For spring browns in close ( 20 FOW or less ) I use my big boards and anywhere form 1/8 oz to 1-1/2 oz of weight. I also set my riggers at 6 feet down and 100 to 120 out. Don’t be afraid to run some sticks in the spring either. I catch about 30 % of my spring fish on sticks. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  9. Fishnut

    Fly leaders

    I use 2 singles, I get more king hookups with singles. Kings have a really hard mouth and it’s easer sinking a single than a triple. I didn’t have any fish come off last year after switching to tandem singles. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  10. These are great engines, I have a 1976 model on my 17 foot aluminum boat. Still runs as good as a new one. Very dependable engine. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  11. Fishnut

    Wind Turbines on Lake Ontario!

    From May 2017. When faced with information such as this climate alarmists resort to their catchphrases of '97% consensus', peer review', '10 years to act' (a favorite of theirs for over 40 years!), 'denier' etc. What they usually avoid is presenting actual facts as a counterargument. The anti-CO2 line in climate changes is a scam. Always has been, always will be. ............................................... Wind turbines are neither clean nor green and they provide zero global energy We urgently need to stop the ecological posturing and invest in gas and nuclear Matt Ridley Tantrum of the climate alarmists Brendan O'Neill The Global Wind Energy Council recently released its latest report, excitedly boasting that ‘the proliferation of wind energy into the global power market continues at a furious pace, after it was revealed that more than 54 gigawatts of clean renewable wind power was installed across the global market last year’. You may have got the impression from announcements like that, and from the obligatory pictures of wind turbines in any BBC story or airport advert about energy, that wind power is making a big contribution to world energy today. You would be wrong. Its contribution is still, after decades — nay centuries — of development, trivial to the point of irrelevance. Here’s a quiz; no conferring. To the nearest whole number, what percentage of the world’s energy consumption was supplied by wind power in 2014, the last year for which there are reliable figures? Was it 20 per cent, 10 per cent or 5 per cent? None of the above: it was 0 per cent. That is to say, to the nearest whole number, there is still no wind power on Earth. Even put together, wind and photovoltaic solar are supplying less than 1 per cent of global energy demand. From the International Energy Agency’s 2016 Key Renewables Trends, we can see that wind provided 0.46 per cent of global energy consumption in 2014, and solar and tide combined provided 0.35 per cent. Remember this is total energy, not just electricity, which is less than a fifth of all final energy, the rest being the solid, gaseous, and liquid fuels that do the heavy lifting for heat, transport and industry. Such numbers are not hard to find, but they don’t figure prominently in reports on energy derived from the unreliables lobby (solar and wind). Their trick is to hide behind the statement that close to 14 per cent of the world’s energy is renewable, with the implication that this is wind and solar. In fact the vast majority — three quarters — is biomass (mainly wood), and a very large part of that is ‘traditional biomass’; sticks and logs and dung burned by the poor in their homes to cook with. Those people need that energy, but they pay a big price in health problems caused by smoke inhalation. Even in rich countries playing with subsidised wind and solar, a huge slug of their renewable energy comes from wood and hydro, the reliable renewables. Meanwhile, world energy demand has been growing at about 2 per cent a year for nearly 40 years. Between 2013 and 2014, again using International Energy Agency data, it grew by just under 2,000 terawatt-hours. If wind turbines were to supply all of that growth but no more, how many would need to be built each year? The answer is nearly 350,000, since a two-megawatt turbine can produce about 0.005 terawatt-hours per annum. That’s one-and-a-half times as many as have been built in the world since governments started pouring consumer funds into this so-called industry in the early 2000s. At a density of, very roughly, 50 acres per megawatt, typical for wind farms, that many turbines would require a land area greater than the British Isles, including Ireland. Every year. If we kept this up for 50 years, we would have covered every square mile of a land area the size of Russia with wind farms. Remember, this would be just to fulfil the new demand for energy, not to displace the vast existing supply of energy from fossil fuels, which currently supply 80 per cent of global energy needs. Do not take refuge in the idea that wind turbines could become more efficient. There is a limit to how much energy you can extract from a moving fluid, the Betz limit, and wind turbines are already close to it. Their effectiveness (the load factor, to use the engineering term) is determined by the wind that is available, and that varies at its own sweet will from second to second, day to day, year to year. As machines, wind turbines are pretty good already; the problem is the wind resource itself, and we cannot change that. It’s a fluctuating stream of low–density energy. Mankind stopped using it for mission-critical transport and mechanical power long ago, for sound reasons. It’s just not very good. As for resource consumption and environmental impacts, the direct effects of wind turbines — killing birds and bats, sinking concrete foundations deep into wild lands — is bad enough. But out of sight and out of mind is the dirty pollution generated in Inner Mongolia by the mining of rare-earth metals for the magnets in the turbines. This generates toxic and radioactive waste on an epic scale, which is why the phrase ‘clean energy’ is such a sick joke and ministers should be ashamed every time it passes their lips. It gets worse. Wind turbines, apart from the fibreglass blades, are made mostly of steel, with concrete bases. They need about 200 times as much material per unit of capacity as a modern combined cycle gas turbine. Steel is made with coal, not just to provide the heat for smelting ore, but to supply the carbon in the alloy. Cement is also often made using coal. The machinery of ‘clean’ renewables is the output of the fossil fuel economy, and largely the coal economy. A two-megawatt wind turbine weighs about 250 tonnes, including the tower, nacelle, rotor and blades. Globally, it takes about half a tonne of coal to make a tonne of steel. Add another 25 tonnes of coal for making the cement and you’re talking 150 tonnes of coal per turbine. Now if we are to build 350,000 wind turbines a year (or a smaller number of bigger ones), just to keep up with increasing energy demand, that will require 50 million tonnes of coal a year. That’s about half the EU’s hard coal–mining output. Forgive me if you have heard this before, but I have a commercial interest in coal. Now it appears that the black stuff also gives me a commercial interest in ‘clean’, green wind power. The point of running through these numbers is to demonstrate that it is utterly futile, on a priori grounds, even to think that wind power can make any significant contribution to world energy supply, let alone to emissions reductions, without ruining the planet. As the late David MacKay pointed out years back, the arithmetic is against such unreliable renewables. The truth is, if you want to power civilisation with fewer greenhouse gas emissions, then you should focus on shifting power generation, heat and transport to natural gas, the economically recoverable reserves of which — thanks to horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing — are much more abundant than we dreamed they ever could be. It is also the lowest-emitting of the fossil fuels, so the emissions intensity of our wealth creation can actually fall while our wealth continues to increase. Good. And let’s put some of that burgeoning wealth in nuclear, fission and fusion, so that it can take over from gas in the second half of this century. That is an engineerable, clean future. Everything else is a political displacement activity, one that is actually counterproductive as a climate policy and, worst of all, shamefully robs the poor to make the rich even richer. www.spectator.co.uk/2017/05/wind-turbines-are-neither-clean-nor-green-and-they-provide-zero-global-energy Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  12. Fishnut

    In my garage

    Hell it might attract them???? Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  13. Fishnut

    Fish hawk - Canada

    Order it from fish USA in Erie. Sent from my iPad using Lake Ontario United
  14. Who’s headed to Niagara this coming weekend for the expo and salmon school?? Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  15. Fishnut

    Wanted deer sheds

    well he started hunting for sheds over Christmas break so this is what he has found since December 22nd until now. the big bucks started dropping their horns pretty early this year. he has put on over 120 miles looking for horns so far. I haven't even gone out yet this year for horns so he'll probably beat me this year shed hunting. my daughter has also found 2 sets and 4 singles so far.
  16. Fishnut

    Wanted deer sheds

    This is what my son found so far this year. Ill ask? Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  17. Fishnut

    Helix 5 chirp DI GPS G2

    I have a Helix 5 on my 17’ boat. I really like it. Works great. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  18. Fishnut

    Expo roll call.

    Hell if it gets too ****ty we could run up a bar bill and stay an extra day.. lol
  19. I think it depends on what your pulling also the fish hawk has a lot of resistance and will not dive as deep with it on the line. I use an app called the Dipsy troller and have had pretty good luck with the depths. if the bottom is at 40 ft. and I let out line to get to 40 ft. ill hit bottom with my Dipsy fairly close to the numbers.
  20. Fishnut

    Expo roll call.

    Its about a 3.5 hr trip for me and the weather don't look great but we are headed north for sure. hope to meet some of you guys there.
  21. Fishnut

    Prop question.

    I think I need a different prop. My boat is a bay-liner 2452 with a 5.0L engine. It’s a pretty heavy boat. When I try to get up in plane it takes for ever, I push the throttle to 5500 rpms and it takes about 5 minutes to get up on plane. Then I can back the throttle down to 4200 and it will be about 24 mph. I have a 16 pitch prop. I have to get up over 18 mph to get on plane. Yes I have my trim tabs down but it doesn’t seam to make any difference. Please help I’m not sure what pitch prop to try next?????? Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  22. Fishnut

    Prop question.

    No I do not. Sorry. I’m sure it’s never been changed from original. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  23. Fishnut

    Prop question.

    Alpha 1 drive and a mercury 5.0L. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  24. Fishnut

    Prop question.

    I believe it 13” Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app
  25. Fishnut

    Prop question.

    The boat has always been stored in doors. And it’s a solid core. (No water log) the boat has always had a problem getting up on plane. At wot it will hit 5800 rpms, I have checked it with a hand held tack and it’s accurate. My prop hub is not slipping. It seams like the prop is too small, not pushing enough water. If I cut the throttle down to 3000 rpms the boat will come off plane. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United mobile app