Jump to content

LongLine

Professional
  • Posts

    4,333
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LongLine

  1. Alewives Thinking about alewife’s – knowing what happened to Huron, Stocking cessation in Michigan & our own stocking reduction of Kings – got me curious about the worldwide population of these fish. I found this article in the Federal Register which I thought was interesting. If you have a couple of hours to kill, you may want to read through it. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/08/12/2013-19380/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-endangered-species-act-listing-determination-for Basically, it’s about saltwater alewife & river herring from the Northern part of Florida all the way up into Canada. 5 or 6 years ago, NOAA was petitioned to put both species on the Endangered Species List. They say neither saltwater species qualifies for endangered or threatened status however most states have banned or restricted catching them. Ocean and Lake Species (andronomus ..sp..and landlocked) are now physiologically different. Towards the end, in their conclusion, they say: “While neither species is currently endangered or threatened, both species are at low abundance compared to historical levels, and monitoring both species is warranted. We agree with the SRT that there are significant data deficiencies for both species, and there is uncertainty associated with available data.” They further say they’ll revisit the subject in 3-5 years, although earlier in the article they say it generally takes 18 years to obtain proof for their determination of endangered/threatened. That should be interesting. I find it interesting that it’s not just a Great Lake issue but that throughout its native range, the alewife is struggling. Also the requirements for getting listed are “wow”! I can’t help but thinking: One factor that all fishing literature talks about is that pollution affects fishing quality and yes I do agree with that, however back in the 60’s, Ontario was quite polluted, (Remember mercury, merex, dioxin, PCBs, and a whole bunch of others.) and there was a tremendous alewife population. Well, Ontario’s retention time is estimated at 6-7 years. (i.e. it takes 6-7 years to replace all the water in the lake) and I can’t help but wonder if the anti-phosphorous legislation, in just about all the states, had an undesirable side effect. For Ontario, especially in combination with the invasive mussels that take the other “good stuff” out of the lake. They do talk at length about climate change, but a few years back, that was quite the bandwagon to climb on. (I’m not saying that they’re wrong about it.) Oh, well, just thoughts. Tom B. (LongLine)
  2. SUNY-ESF published a study back in '98 that put the DEC on alert for natural reproduction. They concluded that Natural repro could be anywhere from 15-90% depending on lake wide conditions. i.e. food supply, temps, winters, invassives etc. Also I believe a couple years ago DEC did a study on the cormorants & found that in addition to eating a lot of smallmouths, they also went after gobies big time. Tom B. (LongLine)
  3. Rev Modish won the 1st derby with a 5 Lb something fish. There were only 5 salmon caught & entered. His prize was a 14 ft aluminum boat with small motor & trailer which he donated to his church. Tom B. (LongLine)
  4. The weight and the size of the cable cause way more blowback than the release. Tom B. (LongLine)
  5. "In 20 years, we can tear it down, fix the lake floor..." HOLD IT! Developers scam the banks for the money and then after they become rich by selling it off, we - THE TAXPAYERS - have to fix their damage. BULL FEATHERS! Turbines only last 20 years before they need replacement - Developers need to fix it. Tom B. (LongLine)
  6. Deck Shuffler (?) Tom B. (LongLine)
  7. Tom B. (LongLine)
  8. Fishy, fishy in the brook, get your hiney on my hook!
  9. Tom B. (LongLine)
  10. Yep. I guess there are two e's in sometimes. opps.. er...oops. Tom B. (LongLine)
  11. Me too...occasionally. Tom B. (LongLine)
  12. Guess that guy has never caught a fish in the propwash while trolling.
  13. Ok I give up...how do you get it to rattle? a lip like a on rebel or rapala?
  14. I 2nd, 3rd & 4th that motion about the clipping trailer! The also ought to do some updates on the telemetry studies that were done way back when and this time take in to account the invasives (mussels) and changing lake temperatures along the nearshore areas. (not just mid lake) Tom B. (LongLine)
  15. So I'm over a school of baitfish & I snag the only 2-3 year old alewife in the school. Really am sorry about that guys...looks like I got the last one. Tom B. (LongLine)
  16. Jerry - I'll support anything that good data shows. I certainly don't want it to go like huron, however I've lived by statistics for over 45 years. A fixed location trawl survey cannot give a good estimate of the entire population. Only random sampling can yield good conclusions about the entire population. If they didn't see many 3 yr olds this year then they didn't see many 2 yr olds last year or 1 yr olds the prior year, hence they should have thrown in a bunch of random sampling sites this year before proposing changes. I've seen their trawl site map & I see 120 trawls in the same basic locations. They threw in additional trawls but they were in the same locations. They need to revisit their sampling techniques rather than practicing their advanced mathematics. Is it best to err on the side of caution?...probably...so as long as they cut the Lakers, I'll vote for it. Tom B. (LongLine)
  17. DEC admits that the salmon weren't in the usual places this year but that they were out there. Why can't they realize that alewives are also fish and probably did the same thing. i.e. took a different path? They're adamant in their fixed location trawling & even sent out that peer review paper but they didn't seem to read it themselves. It stated that the fixed location trawl can't give a good estimate of the overall population. I have never seen as many pods of baitfish as I have this year. They claim the salmon will only eat the 2 or 3 year olds but they'll slouch off the statement that we've all caught big fish on little lures & little ones on big lures as well as vice versa. Guess that's all antectodal though, isn't it. Tom B. (LongLine)
  18. Happy B'day Hank. Wishing you many more. Tom B. (LongLine)
  19. Mine jumped 3 times & would have spooled me if I didn't chase him down.
  20. Sorry guys, I got the last one on Saturday…. Alewife is just under 5 1/2†and the pod wasn’t very big. (That lure is 3 ½†long) If the first alewife I've ever snagged is such a rare fish, I will definitely buy lottery tickets tomorrow! Tom B. (LongLine)
  21. Don't be afraid of speeding it up a little. Just under three. try a flasher/fly above a clean spoon on 1 rigg'r. Hard to beat the ole black & silver. Tom B. (LongLine)
  22. Welcome to the site. Definitely keep the boat moving forward. I always pull lines on one side and try to keep the fish on that side. Tom B. (LongLine)
  23. L-A-L - It's the gearing that will break. They generally rack & gear type lifting devices. The crank turns the gear. Teeth will break off the gear. Wheel is actually stronger than gear. A 2 1/2 Ton hydraulic jack is cheaper than a good trailer jack. Tom B. (LongLine)
  24. my weight weigh 14.4#; homemade & shaped like a missile. I use it on my probe uni-troll but don't extend the boom. I always ease it into the water though. Haven't had any problems, other than it gives me a work out from way down deep. Tom B. (LongLine)
  25. DON'T use the trailer jack. i.e with the wheel on it! You won't know that's it's not strong enough until it breaks. With the rear end blocked up, the full weight of the boat will be on it. (I found out the hard way!) Those wheel jacks are only rated for a few hundred pounds & your boat looks like it weighs about 4200. Tom B. (LongLine)
×
×
  • Create New...